Editorial Process

OEJESR operates a rigorous and transparent peer-review process that aims to maximize quality. Peer review is handled by researchers and scholars.

We believe that peer review needs to be efficient, rigorous, and fair for everyone involved.

In most OEJESR, peer-review is a double-blind assessment with at least two independent reviewers, followed by a final acceptance/rejection decision by the Editor-in-Chief, or another academic editor approved by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the academic quality of the publication process, including acceptance decisions, approval of Guest Editors and Special Issue topics, and appointing new Editorial Board members.

A summary of the editorial process is given in the flowchart below: